
Ajax and Cassandra, Oil on canvas, 1806. Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons. Großherzogliches Schloss Eutin
Mansplaining. It’s a thing. I’ve written about it before. (Dude, I’m pretty sure I know you are.) Better writers than I have tackled the topic in auspicious titles like The Atlantic.
When I write about specific experiences at Fort Ti, or Eastfield, or about “The Hobby” generally, that writing does not mean that I didn’t enjoy myself at events or sites*, or think they’re not doing a good job. It doesn’t mean I’m going to quit the hobby, or that I hate men. It means I’ve taken issue with specific patterns of behaviour that affect not just me but others in the hobby- and sometimes issues that don’t affect me directly, but are serious and need to be addressed.

Woodcut illustration of Cassandra’s prophecy of the fall of Troy (at left) and her death (at right). Giovanni Boccaccio’s De mulieribus claris. Penn Libraries. Inc B-720
I don’t find civilian reenacting a completely mansplaining-free zone, either. It’s better, sure, but this is a societal issue, not a camp- or hobby-specific issue.
And, to Drunktailor, yes, you’re about half-right. The older organizations, the Big Three, the classic units, have more deeply ingrained habits. But when I see younger men and newer organizations perpetuating behaviour patterns I’ve seen from the guys they say they don’t want to be like, I think it’s worth calling out. There is a generational shift, on that you and I agree. But one can become the thing one hates most, or at least adopt some of their patterns, if you don’t examine, and then break, the mold completely.
Further, I believe the young women in living history today will not tolerate nearly as much as I did, and do, in their personal or work lives. They’ve grown up fully in the time of Title IX.
Organizational change is hard. Societal change is hard. It starts with individuals. Listen. Women being talked over have talent, knowledge, and skills that can help move living history forward both professionally and avocationally. They have research, sewing, organizational and management skills that can vastly improve visitor and reenactor experiences.
Fail to listen at your peril. I’ve said it before: Adapt or die.
*And if you ever wonder whether or not I did enjoy an event or site, feel free to ask me about it– or anything else! kittycalash (at) gmail (dot) com. Thanks for playing!
Well clearly I failed to make myself clear enough. I didn’t mean the interpersonal dynamic of the living history scenario itself, because of course that’ll be sexist by today’s standards. I meant the dynamic that occurs after hours, when folks are supposedly just being themselves. I submit that the clothing and the setting have an unconscious effect on some reenactors, causing a just a bit of the 18c mindset to seep into what ought to be a 21c conversation.
Nor did I mean that civilian events would be mansplain-free zones. I think no place in our society is! It’s just that I think they’d be a little bit better.
I am still waiting for the insights of second wave feminism to make their way through all of society, lo these 40 years later. We’ll have equal pay for equal work long before we have something as subtle as equal don’t-interrupt-me-in-a-conversation. Those who are accustomed to privilege have a hard time giving it up. Especially when they’re oblivious to it. I think maybe all we can do is rear the next generation to do better.
Thank you! No, seriously, thank you for blogging about this and pointing it out. I’m a younger reenactor, and these behavior patterns are present across time periods, across units, across locations, and they drive me insane. It’s really nice not to feel alone, and to know other people are starting these conversations too. So thank you!
One additional challenge is handling mansplaining, and sexism in the museum world from visitors. I frequently encounter visitors who use their incorrect concept of history to justify sexism, and then don’t believe you when you politely offer a more correct history, using site specific primary source accounts, i.e. real evidence. It’s a difficult balance between politeness to paying visitors, and making sure that visitors actually learn at your educational historical site.
Pingback: “Massacre the History?” A Brief Perspective from a Caucasian Male | The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the (In)Famous Mr. Hiwell